Your social media is building someone’s brand. Make sure it’s yours.

By Kathryn Ashby • September 28, 2026

Brand series: Part 3


You post. The calendar stays full. Somebody on your team spends real hours finding content, chasing whatever format the platform is rewarding this month, keeping the feed alive. So here’s the question nobody asks: what is all that activity building?


Because it’s building something. Every post either deposits into your brand or leaks out of it. If your feed is trend clips, borrowed memes, and generic industry tips, you’re not building your brand. You’re renting your audience’s attention and handing the equity to the platform, the trend, or the competitor whose content yours resembles.


Social is not a publishing channel

The mistake starts with how most businesses categorize social. They treat it as a distribution problem: we have channels, channels need content, fill the channels. But your customers don’t experience it that way. To them, your social feed is your brand showing up in public several times a week. It’s the most frequent impression you make anywhere. Your website gets visited once. Your feed gets seen over and over, and repetition is where opinions form.

 

In part one of this series, I argued that your brand is what a customer can say about you that they can’t say about anyone else. Social is where that either gets proven or quietly contradicted. A firm that claims “we’re different” and then posts the same recycled tips as every competitor has settled the argument against itself, in public, on a schedule.


The data backs the instinct

Sprout Social’s 2025 Index, which surveyed more than 4,000 consumers across Canada, the US, the UK, and Australia, found that authenticity and relatability are the two traits people value most in brand content, and about half of consumers say original content is what makes their favourite brands stand out. Original. Not frequent. Not trendy. Yours.


Trend-chasing, the default strategy for feeds with no brand behind them, tests even worse. A third of consumers in the same study said it’s embarrassing when brands jump on viral trends. Think about that spend for a second. You’re paying someone to produce content that a meaningful slice of your audience finds embarrassing, in your name.

 

  • And volume doesn’t rescue it. Sprout’s 2025 Content Benchmarks, drawn from nearly three billion messages across a million brand profiles, found that brands actually posted slightly less in 2024 than the year before, while engagement rose almost 20 per cent. The winners aren’t outposting anyone. They’re out-branding them.

 

What a brand-led feed looks like

The fix isn’t complicated, but it does require deciding four things most businesses skip.

  1. One recognizable point of view. Your feed should argue for something: how your industry should work, what your clients deserve, what everyone else gets wrong. A point of view is what makes post number forty build on post number four. Without one, every post starts from zero.
  2. A voice a regular could identify blind. Cover the logo and read three captions. If they could belong to any business in your category, they belong to none. Voice is a brand asset precisely because it can’t be copied the way a template can.
  3. A cadence you can hold. Two good posts a week, every week, beats a two-week burst followed by silence. Consistency is the whole compounding mechanism. An erratic feed reads the way an erratic supplier does: fine until you need to rely on them.
  4. Replies treated as brand work. Sprout’s research found 73 per cent of consumers will go to a competitor if their questions on social go unanswered. The comment section is not an afterthought. It’s the one place prospects watch you deal with real people in real time, and it converts harder than the posts do.


The payoff

Run social this way and the benefits stack. Your content costs less because a point of view generates ideas faster than a trend report does. Your feed starts pre-selling, so prospects arrive at the first meeting already knowing what you stand for. And every post adds to an asset you own, instead of decorating a platform you don’t. 


Your social media is going to build a brand either way. The only question is whose. In part four, we follow the buyer one step further back, to the digital trail they walk before they ever contact you.


inSymmetry works with Canadian advisors and dealer firms to build compliant, measurable growth programs. If you would like a review of how well your social presence is building your brand, get in touch. Figures are drawn from published industry research and are subject to the methodologies and sample sizes of each source.


inSymmetry works with Canadian advisors and dealer firms to build compliant, measurable growth programs. If you would like a benchmark review of your current marketing spend against your growth goals, get in touch. Figures are drawn from published industry research and are subject to the methodologies and sample sizes of each source.


SOURCES

  1. Sprout Social, The 2025 Sprout Social Index, Edition XX: https://sproutsocial.com/insights/index/
  2.  Sprout Social, announcement of 2025 Index findings, January 2025: https://investors.sproutsocial.com/news/news-details/2025/The-Days-of-Trend-Chasing-Are-Over-New-Research-from-Sprout-Social-Reveals-a-Third-of-Consumers-Think-Jumping-on-Viral-Trends-is-Embarrassing-for-Brands/
  3.  Sprout Social, 2025 Content Benchmarks Report: https://sproutsocial.com/insights/data/

What should you be spending

Canadian advisors spend a third of what US advisors do when marketing their business. See where your budget lands against your book.


Insights to fuel your practice

Sign up to get industry insights, trends, and more in your inbox.

Contact Us

SHARE THIS

Latest Posts

Mobile device with digital icons and a thumbs up for a digital concept.
By Kathryn Ashby • September 29, 2026
Buyers research you long before they contact you. Part four of the brand series walks the digital trail your prospects follow, and what it’s telling them about you.
By Kathryn Ashby • September 12, 2026
Somewhere right now, a prospect is deciding whether to hire you. You’re not in the room. You don’t know the meeting is happening. There’s no calendar invite and there never will be, because the meeting is your website, and it’s running without you. This is the single hardest reality many wealth advisors and business owners need to understand: the first meeting isn’t the phone call anymore. It happened earlier, on a screen and by the time someone contacts you they’ve already shortlisted you. Or they didn’t contact you at all, and you’ll never know why. The numbers are blunt The best recent data on this comes from financial services, an industry where trust is everything and the buying decision is as high-stakes as it gets. Wealthtender surveyed 500 US households earning over $100,000 that plan to hire a financial advisor. The findings: 96 per cent will research an advisor online before making a hiring decision, even when that advisor came personally recommended, and 72 per cent will visit the advisor’s website as part of that research. Read that first number again. A warm referral, the strongest lead there is, still gets checked. Ninety-six per cent of the time. The referral opens the door. The website decides whether they walk through it. And they’re comparing. The same study found 97 per cent plan to contact two or more advisors before hiring one. So your site isn’t just being read. It’s being read side by side against your competitors’ sites, by someone actively choosing between you. This is advisor data, but the behaviour is universal. Nobody hires a contractor, a realtor, a consultant, or a firm of any kind without the same quiet screen-based vetting. What the meeting decides So what happens in this meeting you’re not attending? The buyer is answering three key questions, fast. Is this for me? In the Wealthtender study, the top thing people want to know before contacting an advisor is their area of specialization, cited by 64 per cent. If a visitor can’t tell within seconds that you serve people like them, the meeting ends. Not with a no. With a back button. What will this cost me? Fee and pricing structure came second at 62 per cent. You don’t have to publish a rate card, but a site that treats cost as a secret reads as a site with something to hide, and buyers punish it. Can I trust this operation? Nearly half of respondents, 49 per cent, named a professional, user-friendly website as a factor in judging an advisor’s trustworthiness. And it cuts both ways: as buyers get comfortable meeting online and expect modern tools, a dated site stops being neutral. It becomes evidence. The site is also read by machines (AI) There’s one more attendee in the meeting: the algorithms. Search engines and, increasingly, AI tools answer “who should I hire” questions by reading the same website your prospects do. In the Wealthtender study, a quarter of people planning to hire an advisor said they’ll use AI tools like ChatGPT to start their search. A thin, outdated, or vague site gives both the machines and the humans nothing to work with. A clear, current, well-structured one gets quoted, ranked, and recommended. This is why we treat SEO as part of the build, not a bolt-on afterwards: the site’s job is to be findable and convincing, in that order. Winning a meeting you’re not in You can’t attend, but you can prepare the room. The standard is simple to state: your website should do what you would do in a first meeting. Say who you serve, plainly and early. Explain what working with you looks like and what it costs, or at least how pricing works. Show proof: real results, real clients, real reviews. Look after the details, because in a meeting where you can’t speak, the details are your manners. And keep it current, since a site with last year’s news is a storefront with last year’s poster in the window. None of that is a redesign for its own sake. It’s making sure the version of you that meets every prospect first is the version that wins work. Your website is not optional. It is your first meeting. Run it like one. inSymmetry works with Canadian advisors and dealer firms to build compliant, measurable growth programs. If you would like a benchmark review of your current marketing spend against your growth goals, get in touch. Figures are drawn from published industry research and are subject to the methodologies and sample sizes of each source. SOURCES Wealthtender, 2025 Study of $100K+ Households Seeking Financial Advice (survey of 500 US adults, household income $100K+, conducted July 2025): https://wealthtender.com/insights/how-americans-find-and-hire-financial-advisors/
Pencil in a hand on blue background
By Patrick MacLean • August 26, 2026
Expert writing should sit at the centre of advisor marketing. See what the research says about human content, and how AI extends approved work.
Hands pulling out parts of a pie chart.
By Patrick MacLean • August 12, 2026
Canadian advisors spend a third of what US advisors spend on marketing while running comparable books. See what a real growth budget looks like per $1M AUM.
Social media illustration on blue background
By Kathryn Ashby • August 12, 2026
The problem was never how much you post. It’s how much of it works. How to make every post pull its weight, including on Google, where your feed now shows up.
Cartoon of a hand watering a plant that has a store on top for the concept of commerce and payback.
By Kathryn Ashby • July 14, 2026
Strong brands command price premiums, higher valuations, and faster growth. Part two puts numbers on what brand investment returns to your business.
Colourful heads on a wood background showing the concept of identity
By Kathryn Ashby • June 29, 2026
Your logo gets you recognized. It doesn’t get you chosen. Part one of two on what brand really is and why it decides who wins in a crowded market.